This, he said, has been recorded by the magistrate in his order.After going through various reports, Justice Chelameswar told Mr Sinha: "Is this the efficiency of the Delhi police in handling the situation. He also drew the attention of the court to a report of the National Human Rights Commission. Sharma — and setting up of a SIT to probe into the incidents, said the Delhi police remained a silent spectator when the whole incident happened. You are supposed to prevent the assault and apprehend the intruders.Mr Sinha denied that the JNUSU president was assaulted inside the court room. He denied that the Delhi police had remained mute spectators when the violent incidents had happened. He refuted the allegation of the six-member advocate panel that Mr Kumar was assaulted inside the court room.At this juncture, Justice Chelameswar drew the counsel’s attention to the Delhi high court custom precision registrar-general’s report which said the police did not arrest the intruders.M. Chelameswar and A."

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner Ms Kamini Jaiswal seeking initiation of contempt of court proceedings against three lawyers — Vikram Singh Chouhan, Yashpal Singh and O. He said even the registrar-general of the Delhi high court had in his report said that an intruder entered the adjoining room of the court hall and assaulted Mr Kumar. Arguments will continue on April 22.P.A bench of Justices J. This, the judge said, showed the efficiency of the Delhi police.Observing that there has been inaction on the part of the Delhi police, the Supreme Court on Monday indicated that it will consider setting up a special investigation team to probe into the incidents of assault of JNU Students’ Union president Kanhaiya Kumar when he was produced in the Patiala House court on February 17. The petitioners are justified in asking for a SIT and we will examine this.Citing the report of the six-member advocate panel that had visited the Patiala House court complex, Mr Bhushan said there is blatant violation of the rule of law and also contempt on the face of the court committed by certain lawyers, in the Patiala House court premises and complete inaction of the Delhi police.

In these circumstances, Mr Bhushan urged the court to set up an SIT to probe into the incidents of attacks on February 15 and 17 and initiate contempt of court proceedings against the three lawyers. He pointed out that two FIRs were registered and the three lawyers were arrested and they had come out on bail.. Sapre did not accept the arguments of senior counsel Ajit Kumar Sinha, appearing for the Delhi police, that everything was under control and no one had assaulted Mr Kumar in the court hall prior to the commencement of the proceedings. Now you say that the intruders are lawyers.

" The serious fraud investigation office report did not find any fault with the expenditure and "accepted" the غير مجاز مي باشدt incurred, Mr Jaitley said while giving a detailed account of the construction work at Ferozshah Kotla ground which is under scanner.******ti seeks SIT probeAllegations of financial mismanagement in the Delhi District Cricket Association (DDCA) grabbed centrestage in both Houses of Parliament on Monday with BJP Lok Sabha MP ******ti Azad embarrassing the government by seeking a time-bound special investigation team (SIT) probe into the matter. Venugopal. In the Lok Sabha, Mr ******ti Azad, a known detractor of Mr Jaitley, egged on the Congress to seek a time-bound SIT probe. Speak as much as you want.

The finance minister, on his part, said, "The charges are baseless and wrong. The Opposition claimed that the alleged financial bunglings took place in the DDCA when Mr Jaitley was in charge of the association.The Lok Sabha proceedings were adjourned for nearly 20 minutes on Monday morning amid slogan-shouting by Congress members seeking the resignation of Mr Jaitley over the matter. An apparently peeved Ms Mahajan said, "Today I will not stop you from speaking. Ruling out Mr Jaitley’s resignation, parliamentary affairs minister M." Soon thereafter, Congress members rushed to the well raising slogans like "Jaitleyji istifa do (Arun Jaitley, tender resignation)" and "Hitlershahi nahin chalegi (Hitler-ship is not done)".While Question Hour continued for some time, the Speaker adjourned the proceedings for 20 minutes.The main Opposition Congress pressed for the resignation of finance minister Arun Jaitley, who in turn dismissed charges against him as "baseless" and "wrong".

In the absence of Congress leader in the Lok Sabha Mallikarjun Kharge, party chief whip Jyotiraditya Scindia rose to speak, asking Speaker Sumitra Mahajan to consider their notice. The Congress later staged a walkout in the Lok Sabha which was led by party chief Sonia Gandhi.C. Mr Azad, who spoke after Mr Jaitley, even when many BJP leaders were seen asking him to sit down, said if everything was all right about DDCA, then the CBI would not have given a notice to it on October 23. Venkaiah Naidu said that the finance minister is known for his "impeccable character, honesty and maintaining high standards in public life". This is all I have to say. The issue was first raised in the LS by the Congress’ K. The Rajya Sabha too was adjourned repeatedly over the steel casting factory issue.